From 8b5720d6016e2d0cd97ebf01e17121e34e788f7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anton Akhmerov <anton.akhmerov@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:24:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] minor update of tutorial
---
doc/source/tutorial/tutorial5.rst | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/source/tutorial/tutorial5.rst b/doc/source/tutorial/tutorial5.rst
index c7f5a9a3..6b77648f 100644
--- a/doc/source/tutorial/tutorial5.rst
+++ b/doc/source/tutorial/tutorial5.rst
@@ -162,12 +162,10 @@ above the gap. At the gap edge, we observe a resonant Andreev reflection.
freedom in the scattering matrix, even if one uses matrices for
these degrees of freedom. In the solve step,
`~kwant.solvers.sparse.solve` returns an array containing the
- transverse wave functions of the lead modes, if
- ``return_modes=True``. By inspecting the wave functions,
- electron and hole wave functions can be distinguished (they only
- have entries in either the electron part *or* the hole part. If
- you encounter modes with entries in both parts, you hit a very
- unlikely situation in which the standard procedure to compute
- the modes gave you a superposition of electron and hole
- modes. That is still OK for computing particle current, but not
- for electrical current).
+ transverse wave functions of the lead modes. By inspecting the wave
+ functions, electron and hole wave functions can be distinguished (they
+ only have entries in either the electron part *or* the hole part. If you
+ encounter modes with entries in both parts, you hit a very unlikely
+ situation in which the standard procedure to compute the modes gave you
+ a superposition of electron and hole modes. That is still OK for
+ computing particle current, but not for electrical current).
--
GitLab