From aa3845b21689038b70721706cf19891618b289d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bas Nijholt <basnijholt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:55:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] line loss

---
 paper.md | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/paper.md b/paper.md
index 03aa7d1..04bda9b 100755
--- a/paper.md
+++ b/paper.md
@@ -224,8 +224,7 @@ In all cases adaptive sampling performs better, where the error is a factor 1.6-
 ](figures/line_loss_error.pdf){#fig:line_loss_error}
 
 Figure @fig:line_loss_error shows this error as function of the number of points $N$.
-
-<!-- https://bost.ocks.org/mike/simplify/ -->
+Here, we see that for homogeneous sampling to get the same error as sampling with a line loss, a factor $\approx 10$ times more points are needed.
 
 ## A parallelizable adaptive integration algorithm based on cquad
 
-- 
GitLab