From cf838bbe2098940a44dcfeb08d1f4a8bb37f294e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bas Nijholt <basnijholt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:56:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] improve accuracy

---
 paper.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/paper.md b/paper.md
index 04bda9b..43d9075 100755
--- a/paper.md
+++ b/paper.md
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ In all cases adaptive sampling performs better, where the error is a factor 1.6-
 ](figures/line_loss_error.pdf){#fig:line_loss_error}
 
 Figure @fig:line_loss_error shows this error as function of the number of points $N$.
-Here, we see that for homogeneous sampling to get the same error as sampling with a line loss, a factor $\approx 10$ times more points are needed.
+Here, we see that for homogeneous sampling to get the same error as sampling with a line loss, a factor $\approx 1.6-20$ times more points are needed, depending on the function.
 
 ## A parallelizable adaptive integration algorithm based on cquad
 
-- 
GitLab