Commit 6afa1143 by Anton Akhmerov

### close #228

parent f504fc03
Pipeline #81678 passed with stages
in 3 minutes and 34 seconds
 ... @@ -24,13 +24,13 @@ kernelspec: ... @@ -24,13 +24,13 @@ kernelspec: To understand how the vector potential enters a tight-binding model by the so-called Peierls substitution, let us remind ourselves that the gauge-invariance of the Schrodinger equation requires us to transform the wave-function amplitude or equivalently the creation operator of an electron at a site as To understand how the vector potential enters a tight-binding model by the so-called Peierls substitution, let us remind ourselves that the gauge-invariance of the Schrodinger equation requires us to transform the wave-function amplitude or equivalently the creation operator of an electron at a site as \$\$ \$\$ c_j^\dagger \rightarrow c_j^\dagger e^{-i\frac{e}{\hbar c}\Lambda(\bf r_j)}, c_j^\dagger \rightarrow c_j^\dagger \exp\left(-i\frac{e}{\hbar c}\Lambda(\bf r_j)\right), \$\$ \$\$ where \$\Lambda(\bf r)\$ generates the gauge transformation of the vector potential \$\bf A(\bf r)\rightarrow \bf A(\bf r)+\bf\nabla A(\bf r)\$. If there is no magnetic field then the vector potential can locally be set to \$\bf A=0\$ by an appropriate gauge choice of \$\bf \Lambda\$. The hopping term in the absence of a vector potential is written as \$H_t=t_{jl}c_j^\dagger c_l+h.c\$, which must gauge transform to where \$\Lambda(\bf r)\$ generates the gauge transformation of the vector potential \$\bf A(\bf r)\rightarrow \bf A(\bf r)+\bf\nabla \Lambda(\bf r)\$. If there is no magnetic field then the vector potential can locally be set to \$\bf A=0\$ by an appropriate gauge choice of \$\bf \Lambda\$. The hopping term in the absence of a vector potential is written as \$H_t=t_{jl}c_j^\dagger c_l+h.c\$, which must gauge transform to \$\$ \$\$ H_t=t_{jl} e^{-i\frac{e}{\hbar c}(\Lambda(\bf r_j)-\Lambda(\bf r_l))}c_j^\dagger c_l+h.c=t_{jl} e^{-i\frac{e}{\hbar c}(\int_{\bf r_l}^{\bf r_j} d\bf r'\cdot\bf A(\bf r')}c_j^\dagger c_l+h.c. H_t=t_{jl} \exp\left(-i\frac{e}{\hbar c}(\Lambda(\bf r_j)-\Lambda(\bf r_l))\right)c_j^\dagger c_l+h.c=t_{jl} \exp\left(-i\frac{e}{\hbar c}(\int_{\bf r_l}^{\bf r_j} d\bf r'\cdot\bf A(\bf r')\right)c_j^\dagger c_l+h.c. \$\$ \$\$ While this expression is derived for zero magnetic field, by choosing the integration path to be the shortest distance over nearest neighbor bond, this expression is used to include magnetic fields in lattice models. This is referred to as the Peierls substitution for lattices. While this expression is derived for zero magnetic field, by choosing the integration path to be the shortest distance over nearest neighbor bond, this expression is used to include magnetic fields in lattice models. This is referred to as the Peierls substitution for lattices. ... ...
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!