From b2004edb2d06f8e4dc89480176ea366bb11b4f2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kostas Vilkelis <kostasvilkelis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:45:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] fix typos

---
 src/13_semiconductors.md | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/13_semiconductors.md b/src/13_semiconductors.md
index f8007623..8ad0eeb6 100644
--- a/src/13_semiconductors.md
+++ b/src/13_semiconductors.md
@@ -168,9 +168,10 @@ $$ g_h(E_h) = (2m_h)^{3/2}\sqrt{E_h+E_v}/2\pi^2\hbar^3.$$
 
 Here $E_c$ is the energy of an electron at the bottom of the conduction band and $E_v$ is the energy of an electron at the top of the valence band.
 Observe that because we are describing particles in the valence band as holes, $m_h > 0$ and $E_h > -E_v$.
+
 Lastly, it is important to point out the notation that we adopt here. 
 In the above plot, $m_h \neq -m_e$ because it refers to two **different** bands: valance band for holes and conduction band for electrons. 
-In most literature, the band indices are neglected such that $m_{h,v} \to $m_{h}$ and $m_{e,c} \to m_e$. 
+In most literature, the band indices are neglected such that $m_{h,v} \to m_{h}$ and $m_{e,c} \to m_e$. 
 
 
 ??? question "a photon gives a single electron enough energy to move from the valence band to the conduction band. How many particles does this process create?"
@@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ Since the hole energy is opposite $E_h = -E$, we replace the Fermi energy $E_F \
 
 In the third step, we need to solve the equation under charge balance $n_e = n_h$.
 The equation is not a pleasant one and cannot be solved analytically unless an approximation is made.
-Therfore, the fourth step assumes that the Fermi level is far from both bands $E_F-E_v \gg kT$ and $E_c - E_F \gg kT$.
+Therefore, the fourth step assumes that the Fermi level is far from both bands $E_F-E_v \gg kT$ and $E_c - E_F \gg kT$.
 As a result, the Fermi-Dirac distribution is approximately similar to Boltzmann distribution:
 
 $$
-- 
GitLab