Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 37981f62 authored by Christoph Groth's avatar Christoph Groth
Browse files

to-do entries

parent 708d1a3e
Branches
Tags
No related merge requests found
...@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ Roughly in order of importance. -*-org-*- ...@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ Roughly in order of importance. -*-org-*-
there exists an object of the same name in Kwant. (Consider the usage of there exists an object of the same name in Kwant. (Consider the usage of
linking for the term "Thread" in the document linked above.) linking for the term "Thread" in the document linked above.)
* Harmonize numerical tolerances throughout Kwant
By default, a channel should open at the same energy in any solver.
If this is possible, we may want to have one central tolerance setting.
* Plotter: show site upon click * Plotter: show site upon click
* fix physics.noise (docstring, __all__, etc.) * fix physics.noise (docstring, __all__, etc.)
...@@ -134,8 +138,17 @@ Roughly in order of importance. -*-org-*- ...@@ -134,8 +138,17 @@ Roughly in order of importance. -*-org-*-
* Ideas for kwant 2 * Ideas for kwant 2
** Consider whether to use *args or args in System.hamiltonian ** Consider whether to use *args or args in System.hamiltonian
** Names to be reconsidered ** lead_info
- lead_info Currently, lead_info is either of two things, a sequence of propagating modes or a sequence of self-energies.
- There is no need to have lead_info as an attribute of BlockResult.
- In the case of SMatrix and GreensFunction this attribute should be renamed to what it is, i.e. propagating_modes and selfenergies.
- In cases where a common name is needed (i.e. return value of _make_linear_sys), a better name might be lead_data or solved_leads.
- BlockResult itself could be renamed to something more specific, perhaps GeneralSMatrix.
** Unify the order of indices ** Unify the order of indices
For example in wave_function and in PropagatingModes. For example in wave_function and in PropagatingModes.
** Take advantage of when a system is known to be Hermitian
Either
- omit the lead with most open channels by default when calling smatrix and greens_function or
- verify that the scattering matrix is indeed current-conserving (it might be not due to numerical error)
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment