Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
L
lectures
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Mathematics for Quantum Physics
lectures
Commits
4d4db01d
Commit
4d4db01d
authored
4 years ago
by
Scarlett Gauthier
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Add first 2.5 pages of lecture notes.
parent
61cefa10
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
1 merge request
!9
DifferentialEquationsLecture2
Pipeline
#41452
passed
4 years ago
Stage: build
Stage: deploy
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
src/differential_equations_2.md
+139
-0
139 additions, 0 deletions
src/differential_equations_2.md
with
139 additions
and
0 deletions
src/differential_equations_2.md
+
139
−
0
View file @
4d4db01d
...
...
@@ -10,3 +10,142 @@ For this purpose we make the following definitions,
$$y' =
\f
rac{dy}{dx},
\
y'' =
\f
rac{d^2 y}{dx^2},
\ \c
dots,
\
y^{(n)} =
\f
rac{d^n y}{dx^n}.$$
In the new notation, a linear $n$-th order differential equation with constant
coefficients reads
$$y^{(n)} + a_{n-1} y^{(n-1)} +
\c
dots + a_1 y' + a_0 y = 0. $$
!!! info "Linear combination of solutions are still solutions"
Note that as was the case for first order linear DE's, the propery of
linearity once again means that if $y_{1}(x)$ and $y_{2}(x)$ are both
solutions, and $a$ and $b$ are constants,
$$a y_{1}(x) + b y_{2}(x)$$
then linear combination of the solutions is also a solution.
In order to solve a higher order linear DE we will present a trick that makes it
possible to map the problem of solving a single $n$-th order linear DE into a
related problem of solving a system of $n$ first order linear DE's.
To begin, define:
$$y_{1} = y,
\
y_{2} = y',
\ \c
dots,
\
y_{n} = y^{(n-1)}.$$
Then, the differential equation can be re-written as
$$y_1 ' = y_2$$
$$y_2 ' = y_3$$
$$
\v
dots $$
$$y_{n-1} ' = y_{n}$$
$$y_{n} ' = - a_{0} y_{1} - a_{1} y_{2} -
\c
dots - a_{n-1} y_{n}.$$
Notice that together these $n$ equations form a linear first order system, the
first $n-1$ equations of which are trivial. Note that this trick can be used to
reduce any system of $n$-th order linear DE's to a larger system of first order
linear DE's.
Since we have discussed already the method of solution for first order linear
systems, we will outline the general solution to this system. As before, the
general solution will be the linear combination of $n$ linearly independent
solutions $f_{i}(x)$, $i
\e
psilon
\{
1,
\c
dots, n
\}
$, which make up a basis for
the solution space. That is the general solution has the form
$$y(x) = c_1 f_1 (x) + c_2 f_2 (x) +
\c
dots + c_n f_{n}(x). $$
To check that the $n$ solutions form a basis, it is sufficient to verify
$$ det
\b
egin{bmatrix}
f_1(x) &
\h
dots & f_{n}(x)
\\
f_1 ' (x) &
\h
dots & f_{n}'(x)
\\
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\v
dots
\\
f^{(n-1)}_{1} (x) &
\h
dots & f^{(n-1)}_{n} (x)
\\
\e
nd{bmatrix}
\n
eq 0.$$
The determinant in the preceding line is called the
*Wronski determinant*
. In
particular, to determine solutions, we need to find the eigenvalues of
$$
**A**
=
\b
egin{bmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
0 & 0 & 1 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\h
dots &
\v
dots
\\
-a_0 & -a_1 & -a_2 &
\h
dots & -a_{n-1}
\\
\e
nd{bmatrix}.$$
It is possible to show that
$$det(
**A**
-
\l
ambda
\m
athbbm{1}) = -P(
\l
ambda),$$
in which $P(
\l
ambda)$ is the characteristic polynomial of the system matrix $
**A**
$,
$$P(
\l
ambda) =
\l
ambda^n + a_{n-1}
\l
ambda^{n-1} +
\c
dots + a_0.$$
As we demonstrate below, the proof relies on the co-factor expansion technique
for calculating a determinant.
$$- det(
**A**
-
\l
ambda
\m
athbbm{1}) =
\b
egin{bmatrix}
\l
ambda & -1 & 0 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
0 &
\l
ambda & -1 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\h
dots &
\v
dots
\\
a_0 & a_1 & a_2 &
\h
dots & a_{n-1} +
\l
ambda
\\
\e
nd{bmatrix} $$
$$- det(
**A**
-
\l
ambda
\m
athbbm{1}) =
\l
ambda det
\b
egin{bmatrix}
\l
ambda & -1 & 0 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
0 &
\l
ambda & -1 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\h
dots &
\v
dots
\\
a_1 & a_2 & a_3 &
\h
dots & a_{n-1} +
\l
ambda
\\
\e
nd{bmatrix} + (-1)^{n+1}a_0 det
\b
egin{bmatrix}
-1 & 0 & 0 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
\l
ambda & -1 & 0 & hdots & 0
\\
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\h
dots &
\v
dots
\\
0 & 0 &
\h
dots &
\l
ambda & -1
\\
\e
nd{bmatrix}$$
$$- det(
**A**
-
\l
ambda
\m
athbbm{1}) =
\l
ambda det
\b
egin{bmatrix}
\l
ambda & -1 & 0 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
0 &
\l
ambda & -1 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\h
dots &
\v
dots
\\
a_1 & a_2 & a_3 &
\h
dots & a_{n-1} +
\l
ambda
\\
\e
nd{bmatrix} + (-1)^{n+1} a_0 (-1)^{n-1}$$
$$- det(
**A**
-
\l
ambda
\m
athbbm{1}) =
\l
ambda det
\b
egin{bmatrix}
\l
ambda & -1 & 0 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
0 &
\l
ambda & -1 &
\h
dots & 0
\\
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\v
dots &
\h
dots &
\v
dots
\\
a_1 & a_2 & a_3 &
\h
dots & a_{n-1} +
\l
ambda
\\
\e
nd{bmatrix} + a_0$$
$$- det(
**A**
-
\l
ambda
\m
athbbm{1}) =
\l
ambda (
\l
ambda (
\l
ambda
\c
dots + a_2) + a_1) + a_0$$
$$- det(
**A**
-
\l
ambda
\m
athbbm{1}) = P(
\l
ambda).$$
In the second last line of the proof we indicated that the method of co-factor
expansion demonstrated is repeated an additional $n-2$ times. This completes the
proof.
With the characteristic polynomial, it is possible to write the differential
equation as
$$P(
\f
rac{d}{dx})y(x) = 0.$$
To determine solutions, we need to find $
\l
ambda_i$ such that $P(
\l
ambda_i) = 0$.
By the fundamental theorem of algebra, we know that $P(
\l
ambda)$ can be written
as
$$P(
\l
ambda) =
\o
verset{l}{
\u
nderset{k=1}{
\S
igma}} (
\l
ambda -
\l
ambda_k)^{m_k}.$$
In the previous equation $
\l
ambda_k$ are the k roots of the equations, and $m_k$
is the multiplicity of each root. Note that the multiplicities satisfy
$
\o
verset{l}{
\u
nderset{k=1}{
\S
igma}} m_k = n$.
If the multiplicity of each eigenvalue is one, then solutions which form the
basis are then given as:
$$f(x) = e^{
\l
ambda_1 x},
\
e^{
\l
ambda_2 x},
\ \c
dots,
\
e^{
\l
ambda_n x}.$$
If there are eigenvalues with multiplicity greater than one, the the solutions
which form the basis are given as
$$f(x) = e^{
\l
ambda_1 x},
\
x e^{
\l
ambda_1 x} ,
\ \c
dots,
\
x^{m_{1}-1} e^{
\l
ambda_1 x},
\
etc.$$
\ No newline at end of file
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment