Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 6b05e0c9 authored by Sonia Conesa Boj's avatar Sonia Conesa Boj
Browse files

Update 5_operators_QM.md

parent da217df7
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #42716 passed
......@@ -252,20 +252,31 @@ $$
\sum_{k=1}^n\left( A_{ik}B_{kj} - B_{ik}A_{kj} \right) \, .
$$
### Matrix reprensentation of Hermitian operator
### Matrix reprensentation of Hermitian operators
As discussed above, Hermitian operators play a central role in the physical interpretation of quantum systems.
We can now provide the explicit expression of the Hermitian operators in the matrix representation.
Let us assume that we have an operator $\hat{A}$ in an $n$-dimensional Hilbert space
with matrix elements $A_{ij}$ defined with respect to a set of orthonormal basis states, $\|psi_i\rangle; i=1,2,\ldots\,n}$.
From the matrix representation one can construct a new operator by taking the transpose and complex conjugate of the original matrix, that is:
with matrix elements $A_{ij}$ defined with respect to a set of orthonormal basis states, $\{ |psi_i\rangle; i=1,2,\ldots\,n\}$.
From its matrix representation one can construct a new operator by taking the transpose and complex conjugate of the original matrix, that is:
$$
\begin{pmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} & A_{13} & \ldots \\ A_{21} & A_{22} & A_{23} & \ldots\\A_{31} & A_{32} & A_{33} & \ldots \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{pmatrix}\rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} A_{11}^* & A_{12}^* & A_{13}^* & \ldots \\ A_{21}^* & A_{22}^* & A_{23}^* & \ldots\\A_{31}^* & A_{32}^* & A_{33}^* & \ldots \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} & A_{13} & \ldots \\ A_{21} & A_{22} & A_{23} & \ldots\\A_{31} & A_{32} & A_{33} & \ldots \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{pmatrix}\rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} A_{11}^* & A_{21}^* & A_{31}^* & \ldots \\ A_{12}^* & A_{22}^* & A_{32}^* & \ldots\\A_{13}^* & A_{23}^* & A_{33}^* & \ldots \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{pmatrix}
$$
This new matrix will be a new operator that will be represented by $\hat{A}^\dagger$. This new operator is called the *Hermitian adjoint* of
This new matrix corresponds to the matrix representation of a new operator that will be denoted by $\hat{A}^\dagger$. This new operator is called the *Hermitian adjoint* of
the operator $\hat{A}$.
Hermitian operators are such that they are the same as their adjoint version. From the expression in its components that one gets in the matrix representation, the condition of Hermitian operator will therefore read
Hermitian operators are such that they are *the same* as their adjoint version.
That is, at the operator level we can write that Hermitian operators satisfy $\hat{A}=\hat{A}^\dagger$.
From the expression in its components that one gets in the matrix representation, the condition of Hermitian operator will therefore read
$$
\begin{pmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} & A_{13} & \ldots \\ A_{21} & A_{22} & A_{23} & \ldots\\A_{31} & A_{32} & A_{33} & \ldots \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} A_{11}^* & A_{21}^* & A_{31}^* & \ldots \\ A_{12}^* & A_{22}^* & A_{32}^* & \ldots\\A_{13}^* & A_{23}^* & A_{33}^* & \ldots \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{pmatrix}
$$
which can be expressed in a more compact way as
\be
A_{ij} = A_{ji}^* \, , \quad i,j=1,\ldots,n \, .
\ee
Any operator which satisfies this condition will be an Hermitian operator. Note that the Hermiticity of an operator is a property which is independent of the specific choice of basis.
##Problems
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment