Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 4c49b78e authored by T. van der Sar's avatar T. van der Sar
Browse files

Update 14_doping_and_devices_solutions.md - typo

parent 8079e907
Branches
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #61120 passed
...@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ $$ n_e - n_h + n_D - n_A = N_D - N_A $$ ...@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ $$ n_e - n_h + n_D - n_A = N_D - N_A $$
Since $E_G \gg k_B T$, we can only use the law of mass action. Since $E_G \gg k_B T$, we can only use the law of mass action.
But the question offers us another piece of information - we are around $|N_D-N_A| \approx n_i$. But the question offers us another piece of information - we are around $|N_D-N_A| \approx n_i$.
That means that we are near the transition between extrinsic and intrinsic regimes. That means that we are near the transition between extrinsic and intrinsic regimes.
However, we also know that dopants energies are quite small such that $E_C-E_A \ll E_G$ and $E_A-E_V \ll E_G$. However, we also know that dopants energies are quite small such that $E_C-E_D \ll E_G$ and $E_A-E_V \ll E_G$.
That means that we expect $n_i \ll n_D$ and $n_i \ll n_A$ (since both $n_i$ and dopant ionazition depends exponentially of the corresponding energy differences). That means that we expect $n_i \ll n_D$ and $n_i \ll n_A$ (since both $n_i$ and dopant ionazition depends exponentially of the corresponding energy differences).
Therefore, we can confidently say that $N_D \gg n_D$ and $N_A \gg n_A$ so we esentially recover the dopant ionization condition. Therefore, we can confidently say that $N_D \gg n_D$ and $N_A \gg n_A$ so we esentially recover the dopant ionization condition.
Thus, neglecting $n_D$ and $n_A$ such that they are both 0, the solutions to the charge balance are: Thus, neglecting $n_D$ and $n_A$ such that they are both 0, the solutions to the charge balance are:
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment