Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 67a978e1 authored by T. van der Sar's avatar T. van der Sar
Browse files

Update 10_xray.md - polish

parent 04a2b4d5
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #95312 passed
......@@ -54,14 +54,12 @@ _based on chapters 13.1-13.2 & 14.1-14.2 of the book_
In the last lecture, we introduced crystallographic terminology in order to be able to discuss and analyze crystal structures.
In this lecture, we will 1) study how real-space lattices give rise to lattices in reciprocal space (with the goal of understanding dispersion relations) and 2) consider how to probe crystal structures using X-ray diffraction experiments.
## Reciprocal lattice motivation 1D case
In [lecture 7](7_tight_binding.md) we discussed the reciprocal space of a simple 1D lattice.
To obtain the dispersion relation we considered waves of the form
## Recap: the reciprocal lattice in one dimension
In [lecture 7](7_tight_binding.md) we discussed the reciprocal space of a simple 1D lattice with lattice points $x_n = na$, where $n$ is an integer and $a$ is the spacing between the lattice points. To obtain the dispersion relation, we considered waves of the form
$$
e^{ikx_n} = e^{ikna}, \quad n \in \mathbb{Z},
$$
where $x_n = na$ are the lattice points. We then observed that waves with wave vectors $k$ and $k+G$, where $G=2\pi m/a$ with integer $m$, are exactly the same:
We then observed that waves with wavevectors $k$ and $k+G$, where $G=2\pi m/a$ with integer $m$, are exactly the same:
$$
e^{i(k+G)na} = e^{ikna+im2\pi n} = e^{ikna},
$$
......@@ -71,21 +69,20 @@ e^{iGx_n} = e^{i2\pi mn} = 1.
$$
The set of points $G=2\pi m/a$ forms the **reciprocal lattice**.
Let us now generalize this idea to describe reciprocal lattices in 3D.
Let us now generalize this idea to describe reciprocal lattices in three dimensions.
## Extending to higher dimensions
## Extending to three dimensions
We start from a lattice in real space:
$$
\mathbf{R}=n_1\mathbf{a}_1+n_2\mathbf{a}_2+n_3\mathbf{a}_1, \quad \{n_1, n_2, n_3\} \in \mathbb{Z},
\mathbf{R}=n_1\mathbf{a}_1+n_2\mathbf{a}_2+n_3\mathbf{a}_3, \quad \{n_1, n_2, n_3\} \in \mathbb{Z},
$$
where $\mathbf{a}_1$, $\mathbf{a}_2$ and $\mathbf{a}_3$ are the primitive lattice vectors. The reciprocal lattice is also a lattice, but in $k$-space:
$$
\mathbf{G}=m_1\mathbf{b}_1+m_2\mathbf{b}_2+m_3\mathbf{b_3}, \quad \{m_1, m_2, m_3\} \in \mathbb{Z}.
$$
The vectors $\mathbf{b}_1$, $\mathbf{b}_2$ and $\mathbf{b}_2$ are the primitive lattice vectors of the **reciprocal lattice**.
The vectors $\mathbf{b}_1$, $\mathbf{b}_2$ and $\mathbf{b}_2$ are the primitive vectors of the **reciprocal lattice**.
Let us now determine the ${\mathbf{b}_i}$ by requiring that waves that differ by a reciprocal lattice vector are indistinguishable:
We determine the ${\mathbf{b}_i}$ by requiring that waves with wavevectors that differ by a reciprocal lattice vector $\mathbf{G}$ are indistinguishable:
$$
e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{R}} = e^{i(\mathbf{k} + \mathbf{G})\cdot\mathbf{R}},
$$
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment