Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit c3d1f5f9 authored by Bowy La Riviere's avatar Bowy La Riviere
Browse files

Updated most parts of the lecture notes. Still need to add some images

parent ee6ac38c
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!89Lecture 5
Pipeline #48133 passed
......@@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ _(based on chapters 5 and 6.2 of the book)_
- Write down the Schrödinger equation
- Compute eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a matrix
- Find a state bound at a $δ$-function potential in 1D (for the exercises)
- Solve the Schrödinger equation for a bound state with a $δ$-function potential in 1D (for the exercises)
- Write down the quantum numbers of the hydrogen atom
- Describe the orbitals of the hydrogen atoms with the quantum numbers
!!! summary "Learning goals"
......@@ -27,24 +29,26 @@ _(based on chapters 5 and 6.2 of the book)_
- Describe the shell-filling model of atoms
- Derive the LCAO model
- Obtain the spectrum of the LCAO model of several orbitals
- Obtain the energy spectrum of the LCAO model of several orbitals
## Looking back
So far we have:
* Introduced the $k$-space (reciprocal space)
* Postulated electron and phonon dispersion relations
* Postulated the dispersion relation of free electrons and phonons
* Calculated the heat capacity for free electrons and phonons
As a result we:
* Understood how phonons store heat (Debye model)
* Understood how electrons conduct (Drude model) and store heat/energy (Sommerfeld model)
* Understood how free electrons conduct (Drude model) and store heat/energy (Sommerfeld model)
We used our best guess as a starting point, and there are several mysteries:
Through these models, we have made several approximations and postulations, and there are still several mysteries:
* Why is there a cutoff frequency? Why are there no more phonon modes?
* Why do electrons not scatter off from every single atom in the Drude model? Atoms are charged and should provide a lot of scattering.
* Why is there a phonon cutoff frequency? Why are there no more phonon modes beyond this cutoff frequency?
* Why do electrons not scatter off from every single atom in the Drude model?
Atoms are charged and should provide a lot of scattering.
* Why are some materials not metals? (Think if you know a crystal that isn't a metal)
## A quick review of atoms
......@@ -55,86 +59,126 @@ We used our best guess as a starting point, and there are several mysteries:
$$H\psi = E\psi,$$
with $H$ the sum of kinetic energy and Coulomb interaction, so for hydrogen we have:
with $H$ the sum of kinetic energy and the potential energy.
For hydrogen, in which the potential energy is simply a result of the Coulomb interaction between the electron and the nucleus, we have:
$$H=-\hbar^2\frac{\partial^2}{2m\partial {\mathbf r^2}} - \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0|r|}$$
$$H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial {\mathbf r^2}} - \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0|r|}$$.
for helium it becomes more complex: $\psi({\mathbf r})\rightarrow \psi({\mathbf {r_1, r_2}})$, so
In the case of helium, the Hamiltonian becomes more complex: not only is there a Coulomb attraction between the electrons and the nuclei, but there is also a Coulomb repulsion between the two electrons.
$$H=-\hbar^2\frac{\partial^2}{2m\partial {\mathbf r_1^2}} -\hbar^2\frac{\partial^2}{2m\partial {\mathbf r_2^2}}- \frac{2e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0|r_1|} - \frac{2e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0|r_2|} + \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0|r_1 - r_2|},$$
$$H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial {\mathbf r_1^2}} -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial {\mathbf r_2^2}}- \frac{2e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0|r_1|} - \frac{2e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0|r_2|} + \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0|r_1 - r_2|},$$
which means we need to find eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a 6-dimensional differential equation!
which means we need to find eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a 6-dimensional partial differential equation!
"Mundane" copper has 29 electrons, so to find the electronic spectrum of Copper we would need to solve an 87-dimensional Schrödinger equation, and there is no way in the world we can do so.
"Mundane" copper has 29 electrons, so to find the electronic spectrum of Copper we would need to solve an 87-dimensional Schrödinger equation, and there is no way in the world we can do so currently.
This exponential growth in complexity with the number of interacting quantum particles is why *many-body quantum physics* is very much an open area in solid state physics.
This growth in complexity with the number of interacting quantum particles is why *many-body quantum physics* is very much an open area in solid state physics and quantum chemistry.
However we need to focus on what is possible to do, and apply heuristic rules based on the accumulated knowledge of how atoms work (hence we will need a bit of chemistry).
However for us the complexity of solving the problem is the reason why we need to accept empirical observations as *chemical laws* even though they work with limited precision, and are "merely" consequences of the Schrödinger equation.
The complexity of solving the problem is the reason why we need to accept empirical observations as *chemical laws* even though they work with limited precision, and are "merely" consequences of the Schrödinger equation.
### Quantum numbers and shell filling
Single electron states have 4 quantum numbers: $|n, l, l_z, s\rangle$
![](figures/single_atom.svg)
The electrons in a hydrogen orbital can be described by the folowing four quantum numbers: $|n, l, l_z, m_s\rangle$
Quantum numbers:
* $n=1,2,\ldots$ is the azimuthal (principal) quantum number
* $l=0, 1, \ldots, n-1$ is the angular momentum (also known as $s, p, d, f$ orbitals)
* $l_z=-l, -l+1\ldots, l$ is the $z$-component of angular momentum
* $s$ is the spin
* $m_s$ is the $z$-compoment of the spin
It turns out that electrons in all atoms approximately occupy very similar orbitals, only the energies are very different due to the Coulomb interaction.
In the figure below, the orbitals for the first three azimuthal numbers are shown.
![](figures/single_atom.svg)
<!--
Instead of the image above, we plan to show the actual orbitals of hydrogen via this image https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_number#/media/File:Atomic_orbitals_n123_m-eigenstates.png .
-->
It turns out that electrons in other atoms approximately occupy very similar orbitals, only the energies are very different due to the Coulomb interaction.
Therefore, we can use our knowledge of the hydrogen orbitals to describe other atoms.
When we consider an atom with multiple electrons, we need to determine which orbitals are filled and which are not.
The order of orbital filling is set by several rules:
* Aufbau principle: *first fill a complete shell (all electrons with the same $n, l$) before going to the next one*
* Madelung's rule: *first occupy the shells with the lowest $l+n$, and of those with equal $l+n$ those with smaller $n$*
* _Aufbau principle_: electrons first fill a complete shell (all electrons with the same $n$) before going to the next one
* _Madelung's rule_: electrons first occupy the shells with the lowest $n+l$, and of those with equal $n+l$ those with smaller $n$
Therefore shell-filling order is 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, ...
If we take the Aufbau principle and Madelung's rule into account, the shell filling order is 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, ...
Note that there are exceptions to these rules.
Especially for very large atoms.
The electrons in the outermost shell are the only ones participating in chemical reactions and electric conduction.
The rest provides a negatively charged cloud that reduces the attraction to the atomic nucleus.
The valence electrons (those in the outermost shell) are the only ones participating in chemical reactions and electric conduction.
From the valence electrons point of view the bound electrons provide a negatively charged cloud that reduces the effective charge of the atomic nucleus.
## Covalent bonds and linear combination of atomic orbitals
*Here we present the material in the order different from the book because the covalent bonds are the most important for the exercises*
### Two atoms
Consider two atoms next to each other.
Consider two atoms next to each other which form a diatomic molecule.
Since different orbitals of an atom are separated in energy, we consider one orbital per atom (even though this is often a bad starting point and it should only work for $s$-orbitals).
Let's imagine that the atoms are sufficiently far apart, so that the shape of the orbitals or the energy of the orbitals doesn't change much.
Let's imagine that the atoms are sufficiently far apart, such that the shape of the orbitals barely changes due to the presence of the other atom.
If $|1⟩$ is the wave function of an electron bound to the first atom, and $|2⟩$ is the wave function of the electron near the second atom, we will search for a solution in form: $|ψ⟩ = ϕ_{1}|1⟩ + ϕ_{2}|2⟩$, or in other words as a *Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO)*.
If $|1⟩$ is the wave function of an electron bound to the first atom, and $|2⟩$ is the wave function of the electron bound to the second atom, we will search for a solution in the form of:
$$
\|\psi⟩ = \varphi_{1}|1⟩ + \varphi_{2}|2⟩
$$
where $\varphi_{1}$ and $\varphi_{2}$ are the probability amplitudes of the respective orbitals.
The orbital $|\psi⟩$ is called a _molecular orbital_ because it describes the entire orbital of the diatomic molecule.
The molecular orbital is created as a *Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO)*.
For simplicity let's assume now that $⟨1|2⟩=0$, so that $ψ$ is normalized whenever $|ϕ_1|^2 + |ϕ_2|^2 = 1$.
For simplicity, we assume that the atomic orbitals are orthogonal (i.e. $⟨1|2⟩=0$), such that $|\psi>$ is normalized whenever $|\varphi_1|^2 + |\varphi_2|^2 = 1$.
(See the book exercise 6.5 for relaxing this assumption)
Acting with the Hamiltonian on the LCAO wave function we get an eigenvalue problem:
If we apply the Hamiltonian to the molecular orbital $|\psi>$, we obtain
$$
\begin{align}
H|\psi> &= E |\psi>\\
&= \varphi_{1}H|1⟩ + \varphi_{2}H|2⟩\\
\end{align}
$$
Taking the left inner product with either $\langle 1|$, we obtain
$$
\begin{align}
\langle 1|E|\psi> &= \varphi_{1}\langle 1|H|1⟩ + \varphi_{2}\langle 1|H|2⟩\\
&= E \varphi_{1}
\end{align}
The same can be done for $\langle 2|$
$$
E \varphi_2 = \varphi_{1}\langle 2|H|1⟩ + \varphi_{2}\langle 2|H|2⟩
$$
E \begin{pmatrix} ϕ_1 \\ ϕ_2 \end{pmatrix}
We can combine these two equations into an eigenvalue problem
$$
E \begin{pmatrix} \varphi_1 \\ \varphi_2 \end{pmatrix}
= \begin{pmatrix}
⟨1|H|1⟩ & ⟨1|H|2⟩ \\ ⟨2|H|1⟩ & ⟨2|H|2⟩
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix} ϕ_1 \\ ϕ_2\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix} \varphi_1 \\ \varphi_2\end{pmatrix}
$$
It only depends on two parameters remaining of the original problem:
$⟨1|H|1⟩ = ⟨2|H|2⟩ E_0$ is the **onsite energy**, $⟨1|H|2⟩ -t$ is the **hopping integral** (or just **hopping**).
It only depends on two parameters remaining to the original problem:
$⟨1|H|1⟩ = ⟨2|H|2⟩ \equiv E_0$ is the **onsite energy**, $⟨1|H|2⟩ \equiv -t$ is the **hopping integral** (or just **hopping**).
Since we are considering bound states, all orbitals $|n⟩$ are purely real $t$ is real as well.
Since we are considering bound states, all orbitals $|n⟩$ are purely real, hence $t$ is real as well.
Using the previously defined eigenvalue problem, we can construct the Hamiltonian in matrix form
$$ H = \begin{pmatrix} E_0 & -t \\ -t & E_0 \end{pmatrix}$$
Eigenstates & eigenvalues:
$|+⟩ = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1⟩ + |2⟩)$ [even/symmetric superposition with $E_+ = E_0 - t$];
$|-⟩ = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1⟩ - |2⟩)$ [odd/antisymmetric superposition with $E_- = E_0 + t$].
Solving the eigenvalue problem yields the following two eigenstates with their corresponding eigenenergy:
$|+⟩ = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1⟩ + |2⟩)$ &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (even/symmetric superposition with $E_+ = E_0 - t$);
$|-⟩ = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1⟩ - |2⟩)$ &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (odd/antisymmetric superposition with $E_- = E_0 + t$).
<!--
This is where we left of.
-->
Two atoms are a molecule, and $\psi_+$ and $\psi_-$ are **molecular orbitals**.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment