Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit cc717c32 authored by Joseph Weston's avatar Joseph Weston
Browse files

add whatsnew entry for 'System.parameters'

parent ec47af18
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -138,6 +138,38 @@ the scattering region and leads, one could do the following::
kwant.smatrix(syst, params=dict(V_dot=0, V_lead=1))
System parameters can now be inspected
--------------------------------------
In modern Kwant the preferred way to pass arguments to your models
is by *name*, using a dictionary and ``params``::
def onsite(site, magnetic_field, voltage):
return magnetic_field * sigma_z + voltage * sigma_0
def lead_onsite(site, lead_voltage):
return lead_voltage * sigma_0
syst = make_system(onsite)
syst.attach_lead(make_lead(lead_onsite))
syst = syst.finalized()
# naming the arguments makes things clear!
kwant.smatrix(syst, params=dict(magnetic_field=0.5, voltage=1,
lead_voltage=0.2))
This is a much clearer and less error prone than passing arguments by
*position* using ``args``, as was required in older versions of Kwant.
In this version of Kwant we introduce the ``parameters`` attribute of
*finalized systems*, which allows inspection of the names of the
parameters that the system (and its leads) expects::
>>> syst.parameters
frozenset({'magnetic_field', 'voltage'})
>>> syst.leads[0].parameters
frozenset({'V_lead'})
This is a provisional API that may be changed in a future version of Kwant.
Interpolated density plots
--------------------------
A new function `~kwant.plotter.density` has been added that can be used to
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment