-
Maciej Topyla authoredMaciej Topyla authored
title: Vector spaces in quantum mechanics
4. Vector spaces in quantum mechanics
The lecture on vector spaces in quantum mechanics consists of the following parts:
and at the end of the lecture there is a set of exercises
The contents of this lecture are summarised in the following videos:
Total length of the videos: ~14 minutes
4.1. Dirac notation and Hilbert spaces
In the previous lecture, we reviewed the basic properties of linear vector spaces. Next, we will discuss how the same formalism can be applied to describe physical states in quantum mechanics.
The state of a physical system in quantum mechanics is represented by a vector belonging to a complex vector space. This vector space is known as the state space of the system.
Ket
!!! info "Ket" A physical state of a quantum system is represented by a symbol
Hilbert space
The set of all possible state vectors describing a given physical system forms a complex vector space
!!! info "Superposition" A linear combination (or superposition) of two or more state vectors
!!! info "Normalisation" If a physical state of the system is given by a vector
!!! info "Completeness" A set of vectors
!!! info "Basis" A set of vectors {
!!! info "Dimensionality" The minimum number of vectors needed to form a complete set of basis states is known as the dimensionality of the state space. In quantum mechanics you will encounter systems whose Hilbert spaces have very different dimensionality, from the spin-1/2 particle (a
Bra vectors
We need now to extend the Dirac notation to describe other elements of this vector space. We need to introduce a quantity
!!! info "Bra vector" If a ket vector is given by
As mentioned above, the vector space spanned by all bra vectors
Below, we will further discuss the concept of bra vectors when presenting the matrix representation of elements of the Hilbert space.
4.2. Inner product of state vectors
Assume that
The inner product in quantum mechanics is the analog of the usual scalar product that one encounters in vector spaces, and which we reviewed in the previous lecture. As in usual vector spaces, the inner product of two state vectors is a scalar and in this case a complex number in general.
!!! tip "Interpretation of the inner product in quantum mechanics" 1. The value of the inner product
Properties of the inner product
The inner product (probability amplitude)
!!! info "Properties of the inner product" 1. Complex conjugate:
From all the above conditions, we see that a Hilbert space is a so-called complex inner product space, which is nothing else but a complex vector space equipped with a inner product. All the vectors belonging to a Hilbert space \mathcal{H} have a finite norm, which means that they can be normalized to unity. This normalisation condition is essential is we are to apply the probabilistic interpretation of the state vectors described above.
4.3. Matrix representation of ket and bra vectors
As we have discussed, in quantum mechanics a general state vector |\psi\rangle can be represented in terms of the basis vectors, \{|\phi_i\rangle;i=1,2,...,n\}, as |\psi\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^n c_i |\phi_i\rangle for some values of the complex coefficients \{ c_i\}. To determine the values of these coefficients, we can take the inner product between the bra basis vector \langle \phi_j| and the ket state vector |\psi\rangle and use the orthogonality properties of the basis vectors: \langle \phi_j|\psi\rangle = \langle \phi_j|\sum_{i=1}^n c_i |\phi_i\rangle = \sum_{i=1}^n c_i\langle \phi_j|\phi_i\rangle = \sum_{i=1}^n c_i\delta_{ij} = c_j \, . Therefore, if we now denote the coefficients \{ c_i\} of the state vector |\psi\rangle by \{ \psi_i\}, we have the expansion |\psi\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^n \psi_i |\phi_i\rangle= \sum_{i=1}^n \left( \langle \phi_i|\psi\rangle \right) |\phi_i\rangle \, . By analogy with the Euclidean case, we can understand the coefficients \psi_i as the components of the state vector $ |\psi\rangle$ along the n directions spanned by the basis vectors. Here, note also that in this notation \psi_i is an scalar (just a number) and not a vector. Furthermore, note that, as opposed to the Euclidean space, the coefficients \psi_i will generally be complex numbers.
This analogy with the case of ordinary vectors allows us to write the state |\psi\rangle as a column vector with respect to the set of basis vectors \{|\phi_i\rangle;i=1,2,...,n\}, which are kept implicit: |\psi\rangle= \begin{pmatrix} \psi_1\\\psi_2\\\psi_3\\\vdots\\\psi_n\end{pmatrix} \, .
We can also express the basis vectors in this manner. Given that the basis vectors are orthonormal among themselves, the basis state |\phi_i\rangle will have as component in the j direction (\phi_i)_j=\langle \phi_j|\phi_i\rangle=\delta_{ji} \, , and thus the vector column expression of the basis vectors will be very simple |\phi_1\rangle= \begin{pmatrix} 1\\0\\0 \\\vdots\end{pmatrix} \;, \quad |\phi_2\rangle= \begin{pmatrix} 0\\1\\0 \\\vdots\end{pmatrix} \;, \ldots
!!! note "Evaluating the inner product" Let us show how we can use the matrix representation to evaluate the inner product (bracket) between two state vectors when expanded in terms of their components in the same basis: |\psi\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^n \psi_i |\phi_i\rangle \,, \qquad |\chi\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^n \chi_i |\phi_i\rangle\, . First of all, we note that we can write the above expansions in the following way |\psi\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^n |\phi_i \rangle \langle \phi_i | \psi \rangle \, , and thus we see that the basis vectors provide a very useful representation of the identity operator: \hat{I} = \sum_i |\phi_i\rangle \langle\phi_i| \, , We can insert this identify operator within the bracket to evaluate the inner product \langle \chi|\psi\rangle between the two state vectors to evaluate the inner product \langle \chi|\psi\rangle: \langle \chi|\psi\rangle= \langle\chi|\hat{I} |\psi\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^n \langle\chi| \phi_i \rangle \langle\phi_i|\psi\rangle \, . Next, using that \chi_i = \langle \phi_i|\chi \rangle are the components of the state vector |\chi\rangle and that \langle \chi| \phi_n \rangle=(\langle\phi_i|\chi\rangle)^*, we have that \langle \chi |\phi_i\rangle =\chi_i^* and therefore the inner product of the two state vectors |\psi\rangle and |\chi\rangle can be expressed in terms of their components as follows \langle\chi|\psi\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^n\chi_i^*\psi_i. which in the matrix representation of state vectors can also be written as \langle \chi|\psi\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} \chi^*_1 , \chi^*_2 &,\ldots \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} \psi_1 \\ \psi_2 \\ \vdots \end{pmatrix} \, . Therefore, we can present bra vector \langle \chi| as row vectors and ket vectors as column vector. The row vector can thus be treated as the complex conjugate of the corresponding column vector.
4.4. A two-dimensional Hilbert space
As a practical example to illustrate the basic ideas of vector spaces applied to quantum physics presented above, we will consider a quantum system which is fundamental for quantum mechanics and its applications. This system corresponds to the possible states that the intrinsic angular momentum of an electron, known as spin, can occupy. As you will see in following courses, the Hilbert space for the electron spin has dimension n=2, meaning that we can found an electron pointing either in the up direction, denoted by |+\rangle, or the down direction, denoted by |-\rangle.
The general state vector of this system will be expressed as a linear superposition of the up and down states,
|\Psi\rangle = c_+ | + \rangle + c_- | - \rangle \, , \quad c_+ = \langle +|\Psi \rangle
\, , \quad c_- = \langle -|\Psi \rangle \, .
In terms of the matrix representation, if we take | + \rangle
and | - \rangle as the basis for this vector space, we can express |\Psi\rangle
as a column vector
|\Psi\rangle = \left( \begin{array}{c} c_+ \\ c_- \end{array}\right) \, ,
and similarly for the basis vectors
| + \rangle = \left( \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \end{array}\right) \, ,\quad
| - \rangle = \left( \begin{array}{c} 0 \\ 1 \end{array}\right) \, .
We can likewise express the inner product between $ |\Psi\rangle$ and some other state vector |\Psi'\rangle = c_+' | + \rangle + c_-' | - \rangle \, , \quad c_+ '= \langle +|\Psi' \rangle \, , \quad c_-' = \langle -|\Psi' \rangle \, . as a multiplication of a row vector and a column vector, \langle \Psi'|\Psi\rangle = \left( (c'_+)^{*} , (c'_-)^{*} \right)\left( \begin{array}{c} c_+ \\ c_- \end{array}\right) = (c'_+)^{*}c_+ + (c'_-)^{*}c- \, . Note that one needs to take the complex conjugate of the components when expressing a state vector as a bra vector.
Examples of elements of this Hilbert space are the following: \left( \begin{array}{c}3 \\ -2i \end{array} \right) \, ,\quad \left( \begin{array}{c}i \\ -4 \end{array} \right) \, ,\quad \left( \begin{array}{c}2 \\ 5 \end{array} \right) \, . The values of the coefficients c_+ and c_- for these examples above are, respectively, (c_+,c_-) = (3,-2i) \, ,\qquad (c_+,c_-) = (i,-4) \, ,\qquad (c_+,c_-) = (2,5) \, .\qquad !!! warning "" Note however that many other bases are possible, and that the physics of a quantum system do not depend on the basis that we choose.
The bra vectors associated to these ket vectors will be given by |{\Psi}\rangle= \left( \begin{array}{c}3 \\ -2i \end{array} \right) \, , \qquad \langle{\Psi}|=\left( 3, 2i \right) \, , |{\Psi}\rangle = \left( \begin{array}{c}i \\ -4 \end{array} \right) \, , \qquad \langle{\Psi}|=\left( -i , -4 \right)\, , |{\Psi}\rangle= \left( \begin{array}{c}2 \\ 5 \end{array} \right) \, , \qquad \langle{\Psi}|= \left( 2 , 5 \right) \, . Note however that the above vectors are not normalised (the inner product with themselves is different from unity), and thus cannot represent physical states. We show below an explicit example of a normalised state vector belonging to this Hilbert space.
!!! done "Example: Evaluating the inner product" We also know how we can evaluate the inner product between any two state vectors belonging to this Hilbert space. If we have two state vectors given by |\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \begin{array}{c}1 \\ -i \end{array} \right) \, \quad |\phi \rangle = \left( \begin{array}{c}0 \\1 \end{array} \right) then their inner product is \langle \psi | \phi \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( 1 , i \right) \left( \begin{array}{c}0 \\1 \end{array} \right) = \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} and the associated probability will be given by |\langle \psi|\phi\rangle|^2 = \frac{1}{2} meaning that if I measure the state $| \phi \rangle $, I will have a 50% probability of finding it in the state | \psi \rangle. Recall that probabilities must always be smaller than 1 to make physical sense. Note also that I am using normalised vectors, you can check yourselves that \langle \psi |\psi \rangle = \langle \phi | \phi\rangle = 1 \, , as required to ensure the probabilistic description of the state vector.
4.5. Problems
1) [
Two vectors in a three-dimensional complex vector space are defined by: |A\rangle =\begin{pmatrix}2\\-7i\\1\end{pmatrix},~~|B\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}1+3i\\4\\8\end{pmatrix} Let a=6+5i and answer the following questions:
(a). Calculate a|A\rangle, a |B\rangle, and a( |A\rangle+|B\rangle). Show that a(|A\rangle+|B\rangle)=a|A\rangle+a|B\rangle.
(b). Find the inner products \langle A | B\rangle and $\langle B | A\rangle $. What is the relationship between them?
(c) Find the norm of each vector.
2) [
(a) Show that the two state vectors |\Psi\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2}\\ 1/\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix},~~|\Phi\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2}\\ -1/\sqrt{2}\end{pmatrix} are orthogonal to each other. Is the state vector $ |\Psi \rangle$ normalised?
(b) Assume a vector |u \rangle =\begin{pmatrix} x\\ 3x\\-2x\end{pmatrix} where x represents an unknown real number. Find the value of x such that the state vector |u\rangle is normalised.
3) [
4) [
(a) Show that the following vectors are linearly dependent:
|a\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 2\\1\end{pmatrix},~~|b\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 1\\0\end{pmatrix},~~|c\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} -1\\ 0\\-1\end{pmatrix}
(b) Is the following set of vectors linearly independent?
|a\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} 2\\ 0\\0\end{pmatrix},~~|b\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ -1\\0\end{pmatrix},~~|c\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 0\\-1\end{pmatrix}
5) [
Suppose that $|a\rangle $, |b\rangle, |c\rangle is an orthonormal basis. In this basis let us define the following two state vectors: |\Psi\rangle=2i |a\rangle-3|b\rangle+i|c\rangle |\Phi\rangle=3|a\rangle-2|b\rangle+4|c\rangle
(a) Find \langle \Psi| and \langle \Phi|.
(b) Compute the inner product \langle \Phi | \Psi \rangle.
(c) Show that \langle \Phi | \Psi\rangle=\langle \Psi|\Phi\rangle^*.
(d) Write the column vector representing the vector |\Psi\rangle in the given basis. Then write down the row vector that represents \langle \Psi| in the given basis as well.
6) [
The state vector for a spin half particle that passes through a magnetic field oriented in the direction \hat{n} and exists with its spin component in the direction of the magnetic field, i.e. S=\vec{S}\cdot\hat{n}=\frac{1}{2}\hbar is given by |S\rangle =\cos(\theta/2) |+\rangle +\sin(\theta/2) \, e^{i\phi} |-\rangle where \hat{n}=\sin\theta \,\cos\phi \, \hat{i} +\sin\theta \, \sin\phi \,\hat{j}+\cos\theta \, \hat{k}.
(a) What is the corresponding bra vector?
(b) Show that this state is normalized to unity.
(c) Identify the state $|S\rangle $ if \hat{n}=\hat{i}, \hat{j}, and \hat{k}.
(d) Express $|S\rangle $ in terms of the basis states $|-\rangle ,,|+\rangle $ in each case.
7) [
A particle of mass m confined to move in an infinite well of width L can have the energies E_n=\pi^2\hbar^2n^2/2mL^2 where n=1,2,... We can specify the states of the particle in the well by the kets $| 1\rangle $, $|2\rangle $, $|3\rangle $, ... where $|n\rangle $ is the ket corresponding to the particle having the energy E_n. These states form a complete orthonormal set of basis states for the particle in the well.
(a) What is the dimension of the state space for the particle?
(b) State the orthonormality conditions for the kets \{| 1\rangle,|2\rangle,|3\rangle,...\}
(c) A particle is prepared in the state |\psi\rangle=\frac{1}{3}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{3}(2+i)|2\rangle+\alpha|3\rangle. This state is normalized to unity. If the experiment is repeated 500 times under identical conditions, and the energy of the particle in the well is measured, roughly how many times will the particle be observed to have the energy E_3?