Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 03e3dbb1 authored by Maciej Topyla's avatar Maciej Topyla
Browse files

Fixed typos and phrasing, added admonitions

parent 493b5c85
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!23Addressing #16
Pipeline #120540 passed
......@@ -14,10 +14,16 @@ and at the end of the lecture notes, there is a set of corresponding exercises:
- [6.3. Problems](#63-problems)
***
The contents of this lecture are summarised in the following **video**:
- [Eigenvalues and eigenvectors](https://www.dropbox.com/s/n6hb5cu2iy8i8x4/linear_algebra_09.mov?dl=0)
The total length of the videos: ~3 minutes 30 seconds
***
In the previous lecture, we discussed a number of *operator equations*, which have the form
$$
\hat{A}|\psi\rangle=|\varphi\rangle \, ,
......@@ -65,7 +71,7 @@ the rules of matrix multiplication:
$$
where $\mathbb{I}$ is the identity matrix of dimensions $n\times n$, and ${\rm det}$ is the determinant.
This relations follows from the eigenvalue equation in terms of components
This relation follows from the eigenvalue equation in terms of components
$$
\begin{align}
\sum_{j=1}^n A_{ij} v_j &= \lambda v_i \, , \\
......@@ -73,7 +79,7 @@ $$
\to \quad \sum_{j=1}^n\left( A_{ij} - \lambda \delta_{ij}\right) v_j &=0 \, .
\end{align}
$$
Therefore the eigenvalue condition can be written as a set of coupled linear equations
Therefore, the eigenvalue condition can be written as a set of coupled linear equations
$$
\sum_{j=1}^n\left( A_{ij} - \lambda \delta_{ij}\right) v_j =0 \, , \qquad i=1,2,\ldots,n\, ,
$$
......@@ -98,7 +104,7 @@ $$
= A_{11}A_{22} - A_{12}A_{21} \, ,
$$
while the corresponding expression for a matrix belonging to a vector
space in $n=3$ dimensions will be given in terms of the previous expression
space in $n=3$ dimensions in terms of the previous expression will be given as
$$
{\rm det}\left( A \right) = \left| \begin{array}{ccc} A_{11} & A_{12} & A_{13} \\ A_{21} & A_{22}
& A_{23} \\ A_{31} & A_{32}
......@@ -171,14 +177,14 @@ corresponding eigenvalue problem for this operator, what we called above as the
This is most efficiently done in the matrix representation of this operation, where we have
that the above operator equation can be expressed in terms of its components as
$$
\begin{pmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} & A_{13} & \ldots \\ A_{21} & A_{22} & A_{23} & \ldots\\A_{31} & A_{32} & A_{33} & \ldots \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{k,1}\\\psi_{k,2}\\\psi_{k,3} \\\vdots\end{pmatrix}= \lambda_{\psi_k}\begin{pmatrix} \psi_{k,1}\\\psi_{k,2}\\\psi_{k,3} \\\vdots\end{pmatrix} \, , \quad k=1,\ldots,n \, .
\begin{pmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} & A_{13} & \ldots \\ A_{21} & A_{22} & A_{23} & \ldots\\A_{31} & A_{32} & A_{33} & \ldots \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{k,1}\\\psi_{k,2}\\\psi_{k,3} \\\vdots\end{pmatrix}= \lambda_{\psi_k}\begin{pmatrix} \psi_{k,1}\\\psi_{k,2}\\\psi_{k,3} \\\vdots\end{pmatrix} \, .
$$
As discussed above, this condition is identical to solving a set of linear equations
for the form
$$
\begin{pmatrix} A_{11}- \lambda_{\psi_k} & A_{12} & A_{13} & \ldots \\ A_{21} & A_{22}- \lambda_{\psi_k} & A_{23} & \ldots\\A_{31} & A_{32} & A_{33}- \lambda_{\psi_k} & \ldots \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix} \psi_{k,1}\\\psi_{k,2}\\\psi_{k,3} \\\vdots\end{pmatrix}=0 \, , \quad k=1,\ldots,n \, .
\begin{pmatrix} \psi_{k,1}\\\psi_{k,2}\\\psi_{k,3} \\\vdots\end{pmatrix}=0 \, .
$$
!!! info "Cramer's rule"
......@@ -250,7 +256,7 @@ are *orthogonal* among them.
$$\hat{H}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\1&-1\end{pmatrix} \, .$$
Determine the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of this operator.
5.*Hermitian matrix*
5. *Hermitian matrix*
Show that the Hermitian matrix
$$\begin{pmatrix} 0&0&i\\0&1&0\\-i&0&0 \end{pmatrix}$$
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment