Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • adaptive adaptive
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 36
    • Issues 36
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 5
    • Merge requests 5
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Quantum TinkererQuantum Tinkerer
  • adaptiveadaptive
  • Merge requests
  • !131

Resolve "(Learner1D) add possibility to use the direct neighbors in the loss"

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Jorn Hoofwijk requested to merge 119-add-second-order-loss-to-adaptive into master Oct 26, 2018
  • Overview 43
  • Commits 8
  • Pipelines 50
  • Changes 8

Closes #119 (closed)

Currently works for one R^1 \to R^1

Still have to make it work for R^1 \to R^N

Also performance is actually quite good. As in: the learner slows down about 1.5 times. Going (on my laptop) from 3 seconds per 1000 points to 4.5 seconds per 1000 points.

Which, I believe, will be more than compensated by the fact that the chosen points are generally better

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: 119-add-second-order-loss-to-adaptive